11 November 2008

Homeland Security Theatre


This was something I was reminded of last Friday as I caught a plane to Dallas: the absolute absurdity of the Homeland Security Agency and their color-coded threats.
I'd try to stay away from the fact that almost everything we're doing is simply for appearance's sake and has little to no effect on our safety. It really gets my goat, but that's not the focus of this post.
I want you to concentrate on the threat level orange. For most of the time this system has been in place, we've been under Orange threat levels. It's once gone up to Red, sometimes been at Yellow, and has never been at Blue or Green. Judging by what this chart says, during most of the time since early 2002, we've been at a high risk of suffering another terrorist attack. That sounds somewhat plausible on the face of it, though I'd take exceptions to that.
But let's study high risk some more. What would you consider a high risk activity? Or better yet, at what odds would you consider something likely to occur? Normally, I'd say something that happens greater than half the time has a high probability of occurring. However, if we're talking about death, I'd probably say that any activity that causes death one time out of a thousand is probably pretty high risk. Let's take it one step further and say that I feel that anything that causes death one time in a million is high risk. Most insurers would call this "effectively zero", but let's say I'm exceedingly paranoid and I want to be very safe in my activities.
Now, let's do some math. The population of the United States is just over 305 million people. Even defining "high risk" the way I am, something that's a "one in a million" chance will happen to approximately 305 people in the United States. That means that if I say there's a one in a million chance that someone will be killed by a terrorist attack in the United States this year, it will still happen to 305 people.
During the time that we've been under Orange alert exactly zero people have died in the United States as a result of a terrorist attack. Even if I roll back the data to the worst terrorist incident ever on record, 9/11/01, we're still looking at a sum total of 3,003 people killed as a result of terrorist actions (this includes the 9/11 hijackings as well as the 9/18 anthrax attacks). This is roughly 429 people a year. It's more likely than our 1:1,000,000 ratio, but not by much -- it's approximately 1:711,000. It gets much more absurd if we start rolling back to the previous terrorist attack, in 1995. The total deaths go up to 3171, and our time frame goes to 13.5 years. At this rate, terrorists are killing Americans on American soil at a rate of 235 a year -- which makes the effective odds of dying in a terrorist attack on American soil one in 1.29 million.
This is absolutely absurd to worry about, much less to even try to prevent. The chances that you'll be struck by lightening are only one in two hundred and eighty thousand.
But wait, you say. Look at how many people died on 2001 -- maybe it's ok to be on high alert when the consequences are so high. It's not, but let's start by doing the math. On the worst of the worst years for terrorism in the US, 3003 people died. The odds in 2001 that you would have been killed by a terrorist attack were 1:101,000. By using that year alone, we're finally more likely to die from a terrorist attack than to be struck by lightening. However, we're still at a level that just about any insurer is going to call "statistically insignificant" and pretty close to "effectively zero".
Let's keep looking at that number. 1:101,000. A pretty big number, but it doesn't even crack the top 10 for leading causes of death in 2001. Nephritis (39,480 deaths, #9) killed over 10 times as many people as terrorists, as did Septicemia (32,238, #10). Terrorist attacks don't even make the top 20 list in 2001, which happens to be held by Perinatal Period which caused 13, 887 deaths. To illustrate my point even further, 15,019 people died falling down stairs in 2001. Are you afraid of the stairs in your home? Do you think twice when someone tells you they saw some stairs in the mall yesterday? Would you consider someone crazy for harboring a set of stairs or two in their own home?
Literally, the risk of a terrorist attack claiming your life or even the life of someone you know is so incredibly low there's no sense worrying about it, and there is nothing you can effectively do to mitigate it. I remember when I was working at Boeing a year ago -- 787 simulators, fantastically interesting -- my brother asked me what was usually the cause of an airliner crash. He was expecting me to say something like "metal fatigue" or "pilot error" or "improper maintenance" but honestly, crashes of either Boeing airliners or Airbus airliners are so incredibly rare that they are effectively anomalies in the data. They do happen, of course, but they are so rare that we can't effectively predict them, prevent them, or even say that there's any commonality. Each one is unique, and while airliners do crash, they crash with such infrequency that there are few activities we can do that are safer. Terrorist attacks are more infrequent than that, and usually claim less lives. We can't predict them, we can't harden everything, and the cost of chasing this futile dream is more than it would cost to just deal with the ramifications of terrorist attacks when they do occur. So many man-hours are wasted just by people waiting in security lines now that every year more lives are lost by that alone than were actually lost on 9/11. We spent 50 billion just last year on the Department of Homeland Security alone -- an agency that didn't even exist prior to 9/11. The insured losses on 9/11 were 40 billion. We're effectively spending more every year in an attempt to prevent an attack that will statisitically never happen again.
Ah, but I digress. Let's look at that chart again. "High risk of Terrorist Attacks". If we were truly at high risk of another attack, don't you think it would have happened by now? Shouldn't it be happening every day? Under my definition of high risk, there should be planes crashing all over the place, and everyone should have a story about the guy that got pulled out of line with 10 pounds of explosives strapped to his chest. We don't have any of that -- we've just got glorified security guards giving people shit because they want to bring a half-liter bottle of Coca-Cola on an airplane. Maybe it's time we stopped scaring the general population and start realizing that life is dangerous but even with the threat of terrorism, it's still far less dangerous than the lives our parents and grandparents faced.
Otherwise, the terrorists really have won. They've made us scared and forced us to give up freedom for illusionary security.

04 November 2008

A Change in Focus

I originally intended to make this a blog about traffic tickets, their absurdity (they aren't based on safety, it's all revenue generation), and how to get out of them, among other things, but that just isn't happening. For one, I haven't had a ticket in a very long time. I had nine in 2007, but zero in 2008. Go figure. So, there just isn't anything exciting to write about -- which I'm kind of happy for, those nine tickets cost me a lot of money.

My other blog was far more successful when I was just writing about what I found interesting at the time, and I'm not really looking for a base of users, just a place to write my thoughts.

So, in that regard, the format is shifting. I'll still post about traffic tickets, but for now at least, it's just going to be a blog about whatever I find interesting. I'm going to try to post every day.

We'll see how that goes.

10 October 2008

Porsche buying Volkswagon?


Word on the street says that Porsche might just buy Volkswagen Auto Group.   Sounds odd, right?  I mean, Porsche is this little niche maker who nearly went bankrupt in the late 80's.   And VAG is huge -- for those not in the know, Volkswagen also owns Audi, along with several other manufacturers like Lamborghini.  

But the real secret is that Porsche has been buying up VAG stock for years, and has a majority share in the company.   Now they just want to own it outright and buy out the current legal ower Lower Saxony.  They're close to doing it and just might pull the trigger.  

I think it's interesting and neat, partially because I own a Porsche, but also because I wonder what Porsche would do and could do with all of these companies under their umbrella.  I will say that my Porsche is an amazing machine, and it amazes me how it does everything so well without much compromise (I can't carry three people, but oh well, I haven't owned a car with a backseat since 1999) and without breaking or needing much maintenence (my first scheduled maintenence/oil change was at 20k miles).    And then I think about how Porsche was nearly bankrupt not 10 years ago and think what an amazing board of directors this company must have.   What in the world could Volkswagon, Audi, and Lamborghini look like after 10 years under Porsche's leadership? 

They might well be the GM of this generation. 

09 October 2008

A page from the Nissan GT-R owner's manual












It pretty much says it all.  I thought owning a Porsche was high maintenence, but I never knew I could own a car with a disposable transmission.

Supposedly someone's already grenaded one.   $20k in parts and labor, and no, it's not covered under warranty.  Nissan says 15 hard launches are enough to destroy it. 

One down, six to go I guess.  

18 August 2008

Why you drink

Story of my life.


06 August 2008

Was airline food ever any good?

Apparently, in the 60's, it might have been.

Someone's managed to put all the major airlines' menus from the 60's online. Check it out here.

29 July 2008

Be careful out there kids.

This is what assaulting a police officer and resisting arrest looks like:



Gothamist has more about it, but basically, we're looking at a completely fabricated report. Since I'm still bitter about the fabrication that went on in my "reckless driving" case, it's nice to see this officer busted. Hopefully the ubiquitous nature of video recording devices these days means this happens less and less.

...if only I'd had a camera that night.

15 July 2008

Infiniti FX50S -- The Car that (nearly) drives itself


Not the prettiest car on the planet, but that's not what I'm talking about today.


Wha I am talking about is the fact that this car has more techno-automation-wizardry than just about anything I've ever seen. Now, I'm a tech guy, so this is fascinating, but on the other hand, judging by all the inattentive people I see on the freeway every day, I'm not sure all of this is a good idea.

Here's what's going to make me give this crossover a wide berth the next time I see one on the freeway.

  1. Let's say you're drinking your mocha coffee while you're talking on your cell phone and trying to keep your kid occupied in the back seat and you have this continual problem of drifting over the dividing line on the freeway. Here's where LDW (Lane Departure Warning) comes in -- it will beep whenever it detects the tires drifting over lane markings.
  2. But, let's say you're not paying attention and between the cell phone and the kid, you can't actually hear the lane departure warning. Never fear, we also have LDP (Lane Departure Prevention). If you don't respond to the LDW, it will use the rear brakes to nudge you back into your lane. Car and Driver says this allows for pretty much hands free driving, though it has trouble with strong crosswinds.
  3. Now that you're so busy you can't even manage to stay in your lane, we can't possibly expect you to be able to operate the throttle, right? Infiniti has you covered again! ICC (Intelligent Cruise Control) monitors the traffic in front of you to maintain speed and a safe following distance. It's also fairly intelligent and smooth, so it'll do all this without upsetting your latte or your late afternoon slumber.
  4. But, since we're traveling during the afternoon, sooner or later, we're going to hit rush hour traffic. Again, we're covered, because ICC is partnered with DCA (Distance Control Assist). Once you hit rush hour traffic, the ICC keeps working, creeping along and slowing the car as needed. At least, until DCA actually causes the car to stop. Then you'll have to actually wake up and tap the gas pedal to get the car moving again. Small price to pay for inattention, I guess.
  5. Then again, you may be really determined to crash your new Infiniti. No dice. IBA (Intelligent Brake Assist) is here to save the day. Even if you're a colossal idiot, IBA will still apply the brakes for you when it detects a crash is imminent -- even if you don't touch them yourself.

Now, I can certainly see the safety aspects of all this -- at least for the driver of the Infiniti -- and the technology behind it is kick-ass, but I can't help but think this is a fantastically bad idea. People already pay too little attention on the freeway, and it's not like you need a fantastic amount of skill or attention to pilot your car safely on one. This just encourages people to be bigger idiots and while on paper it appears to make things safer for us all, I think people are going to be encouraged to drive even more dangerously because the car "has an autopilot". Kind of like how ABS-equipped cars aren't any safer in the real world because people drive them faster in bad conditions because "it's safe".

Then again, maybe this means drunk drivers can get home without hitting anything, so that's a good thing. Unless, of course, it just encourages drunks to try this stunt.

30 May 2008

How many tickets last year?

NINE?

Yes, that's right. Nine of those motherfuckers. Let's sort out the year, shall we?

1. Reckless Driving, Austin, Texas, near Alamo Drafthouse South Lamar. It started on Easter Sunday morning, 2007. Appoximately 3:00 am on the coldest Easter on record in Austin. I was driving the race-prepped Miata with race tires. Needless to say, it was like driving on ice. I left a stop light, turned left through the intersection, lost traction and gently drifted the car through the intersection. This was a four lane intersection, there was no traffic, I never got outside my lane, never broke the speed limit, and traveled maybe 1000 feet from time I left the light until I pulled over. Unfortunately, the most overzealous DUI officer in all of Austin pulled me over, absolutely positive I was drunk, which I most certainly was not. After his "I'm a prick, you're a criminal, I'm giving you a ticket for sure" attitude, my "I'm tired, give me the lecture or the ticket, I don't need both" attitude, I ended up with a Reckless Driving ticket.

Never had one before, but I soon learned it's the real cocksucker of a ticket -- purely cop's discretion and it carries the possibility of really large fines, jail time, and stupidly expensive insurance. Very nearly the same penalties as a DUI. Joy.

I hired a lawyer for that one. Nearly $3000 and a year later, it's a done deal. Most expensive ticket I've ever gotten and for one of the most bullshit reasons. As my lawyer said, "it's usually a ticket they give for going the wrong way down I-35, I really don't understand." Next time, I'll remember to check my attitude when the officer walks up and wants to be a real prick. I know better, but this was an expensive reminder.

2. 68 in 45. Austin, 2222. The police decided to stake out my favorite street by my house, and I didn't realize it. Prevailing speed on 2222 is usually over 55 mph, even though the speed limit says 45. I usually run it around 90 or so. Luckily, I was taking it "slow". I took defensive driving for this one, because I was still fighting the reckless driving and didn't know how a deferred adjudication was going to work at the same time.

3. 55 in 45. Austin, 2222. Two weeks later, same spot. Well, fuck. Went to court, told the judge I obviously hadn't learned my lesson the first time, and he let me take the defensive driving course for both. Ha ha.

4. 91 in 65. Somewhere in Illinois. I had picked up the red Porsche Cayman S you see in the title bar in Chicago and I was driving it back to Austin. It's a long drive, so I was driving fast. He caught me at 91, but that was fair, since I'd already ran from three cops, and I'd been traveling north of 120 mph. One can only get so lucky. I was able to take Illinois' driving course by mail, and they don't report back to Texas, so I didn't have to show up for court and it didn't go on my record.

5. 89 in a 65. Columbus, Texas, highway 71. 71 is a notorious speed trap, and I know better than to take this route from Houston, but the contract I was working there meant I could either take it or spend an extra hour traveling up to 290. And one night it bit me in the ass. Columbus offers deferred adjudication by mail, and it's only 30 days, so that's exactly what I did.

6. 78 in a 65. Columbus, Texas, highway 71. It's just not my year, is it? Not only did I know better, I got popped by the same officer in very nearly the same spot. Blame it on being tired and thinking the ticket was in a different jurisdiction. The funny thing was, we had the exact same conversation about my missing front plate, right down to my total bullshit "the bracket is on the slow boat from Germany" excuse and his "well, if I catch you without it again, I'm going to write you up" response. Sure thing, officer.

This one got complex since it fell within the 30 day deadline that I wasn't supposed to get another ticket. I drug out my court date as long as I could, and by the time I went to court, they totally forgot that I was on deferred adjudication when I got this one. Deferred adjudication again, and it didn't go on my record.

7,8,9. Speeding (no speed given), running a stop sign, failure to signal lane change, Katy, Texas. Yeah. I probably deserved all of these, though I'm not sure I actually ran a stop sign. I was being a royal jackass in the neighborhood I was renting in. Like 11pm at night, running the car up to redline through three gears, and other real jackass behavior. Honestly, I thought I was going to get another reckless driving ticket. When the tow trucks showed up behind the police car, I was positive of it. For whatever reason, the officer cut me a "break". That's still a good $700 in tickets. Not to mention, getting out of one ticket isn't hard. Getting out of three simultaneously in three different jurisdictions is a bit of a juggling act, but not much more difficult. Getting out of three at once? Well, that's usually difficult.

I did my research, and while the officer was in his jurisdiction, he sent me to the wrong precinct. I figured this gave me two opportunities to cut a deal -- if I couldn't do it in the one he sent the ticket to, I could have it thrown out for not being in the right court. Of course, that most likely means it would be filed in the other court, but I get two shots at it. Plus, I figured this court would want to deal since even a little money in their coffers is better than none at all. I was right.

I walked in, started to state my case, and the prosecuting attorney said, "before you say anything, just listen to what I have to say." He offered to dismiss the running a stop sign ticket and failure to signal outright, and all I had to do was pay the fine for the speeding ticket and none of them would go on my record. He already had all the paperwork drawn up, all I had to do was sign it. That's a pretty good deal, so I took it.


And that was that. Nine tickets, one year, no convictions, no insurance hit. I'm actually trying to slow down this year, we'll see how that goes. So far, no tickets. Thank God, last year was expensive.

Something non-car related ... but funny.

Iggy Pop and the Stooges' concert rider. It's like the ramblings of a mad man on acid who also knows exactly what he wants and why. The stream-of-consciousness writing really sells it.

Hey, I got a ticket! What now?

This was written a while back for another site, but I'd pretty much write the same thing today anyway.

Oh boy, you got a ticket. Believe me when I tell you that tickets are no big deal. Yes, you can get out of them. I’ve had over 60 myself in 15 years of driving. A police officer pulling me over doesn’t even raise my heart rate any more, I’m just impatient and ready to get back on the road – can’t he tell I’m in a hurry? Have I ever had my license suspended? No. Have I ever been in serious trouble over my tickets? No. Have I gotten out of all of them? No, but I have gotten out of all but a very small handful, maybe five or six. Almost all of those were before I realized how to fight. I have not had a ticket go on my record since 1996, and it’s not because I stopped getting them.

This is an accounting of all of my knowledge about getting out of tickets. Why am I doing this? Because I’m tired of people asking me for advice. I’m tired of telling people how to get out of their tickets. I’m tired of having typed this up three dozen times. Read this, and you’ll know how to get out of your tickets. This is everything I know. However, you should also know that I am not a lawyer, and my experience is only with courts in the state of Texas. Your laws may differ, and your mileage may vary. I am not responsible if these tricks do not work for you.


First things first, you must understand what traffic ticketing is really all about – revenue generation. If you don’t understand this fact, and really believe that tickets are all about right and wrong, you will lose. You will attempt to play a game that doesn’t actually exist, and you will be unprepared for the game you are being forced to play. This was my mistake in many of my first tickets, and one of the tickets I got nailed for was one of the few I wasn’t guilty of. The speed limits are consistently set artificially low, and everyone breaks them knowing they are loosely enforced. Then, when the police need to make a little bit of extra money, they have a huge pool of "criminals" to pick from. Think about it this way, how many people do you know that have never broken the speed limit? Do you really think that 35 mph is a reasonable speed for a dry five lane road at 3am? Conditions change, and most people drive a reasonable speed considering the conditions. Studies have shown that speed limits have little effect on how fast the average driver travels, but they do cause a greater disparity of speed – which is actually what’s dangerous. It’s not so bad to drive 80 mph on the freeway when everyone else is driving 80 mph, but it’s quite another if four cars are traveling at 35 mph. This isn’t the only decision that’s made in the interest of revenue generation and against your safety – in many places where red light cameras are installed, the yellow light time is decreased. Why? Because that causes more people to run the red light. Some run it out of indecision, they can’t figure out what the correct action should be, but the vast majority is stuck in a zone where they can neither stop safely nor clear the intersection before the light is red. Longer yellows are safer for the motorist, but they don’t generate nearly as much revenue. Guess which one usually wins? I’ll get off my soapbox now, but I really want you to understand that the vast majority of tickets are not about safety, and they are not about right and wrong, they are simply a means for police departments to generate revenue.


Now that you understand the concept of your ticket, you are better prepared to fight it. The first thing you should do is come to the realization that since this is about revenue generation, this is probably going to cost you some money and some time. Our object here is to keep the hurt to a minimum. The sooner you come to this realization, the closer you are to beating your ticket. During my glory days of speeding, I often called this my “speeding tax”. I would typically get about six tickets a year, if I drove as fast as wanted where ever and whenever I wanted. Those six tickets would cost me, on average, about $150. So, for the cost of about $900 a year, I could speed with impunity. Think about that for a while. For a long time, it was worth it to me, and had the economy not taken such a downturn, I’d probably still be doing it today.


Second, you need to understand that it’s not so much the court’s fine that stings, it’s the insurance and points hit you’ll accrue if you just pay the ticket outright. Even if insurance just raises your rates $15 a month for a ticket, that’s $180 a year for the next three years. If you have a run of bad luck (and remember, everyone speeds) and rack up two or three during that time, you’ll be placed in a high-risk pool. Forget about reasonable rates, your rate will at least double or triple. Then, there’s the points to worry about. If you collect enough of these, they’ll take your license and you’ll be walking. Or driving without a license. So, when we talk about minimizing damage, the primary goal is to keep the ticket off our record. Our secondary goal is to decrease our court costs – but we should never compromise the success of our primary goal in the pursuit of our secondary one.


Third, you need to figure out what kind of ticket you’ve got. A “fix-it” ticket is very different from a generic moving violation, which is different from a DUI or reckless driving ticket or street racing ticket. If you got one of the latter tickets, you need to stop reading now and go get a lawyer. Those types of tickets carry heavy penalties and possibly jail time and vehicle confiscation. They are not to be fucked with, regardless of your innocence. You need a lawyer.


If you got a fix it ticket, you’re pretty much almost home. Luckily, these don’t go on your record, insurance never finds out, and they don’t usually cost all that much – if you fix the violation. So, go get the problem fixed (which you should probably fix anyway), prove to the court it’s fixed, and pay the reduced fine, usually something trivial, like $10. If it’s truly something stupid, like a front license plate violation, then fix it just long enough for the court to verify things are cool, then change it back.


If you got a moving violation (or perhaps a fix-it ticket you just can’t fix), then things get a lot more complex. Understand that at this point, you still have a lot of options available, but not all of them are good ones, and there’s not a single option that will work every time. You must be flexible and willing to work within the system. You must also be dynamic and intelligent and willing to change course when the situation demands it.


The easiest course of action is just to hire a traffic attorney. For anywhere between $50-150, they will do everything for you that I’m about to outline below. You might have to make a token court appearance and maybe pay a small fine to the court, but other than that, the ticket just disappears. I did this for a long time, and that’s how I learned the majority of the tricks detailed below. I will still do it if I get stuck with a really large ticket, like the 105 in a 55 I got four years ago. On a ticket that large, your options are limited and a lawyer can be of great assistance. For your run of the mill speeding ticket (25 over or less), it’s not really necessary, but if you are that worried, the extra insurance can be nice.


If you’re 25 over or less, a common option is to take a driver’s safety course. In Texas, it’s called defensive driving. Typically, you will not be (initially, at least) offered this option if you’re over 25 mph over the speed limit. I highly recommend that you don’t take it. Again, you’re going to ask me why. My reasoning for this is that this is your ‘get out of jail free’ card. It’s better to save it for when you really need it, and it’s nice to know that the entire time you’re negotiating, you’ve got an ace in the hole. If you have this option, at any time you feel that you just can’t win, you can opt out and take the course. It’s a powerful negotiating chip, but you only get one per year here in Texas. At one time, it was one every three years. Are you absolutely sure that you won’t get another ticket in a year? Remember, some courts are easier to work with than others, maybe it’s best to save that thing for when a court just won’t play ball.


Now, we get the meat of the matter. You’re actually going to fight the ticket yourself rather than take the easy options. Good for you. If more people did this, there wouldn’t be any money in the system and we’d stop getting bullshit tickets and bullshit traffic laws. Let’s first clear up some misconceptions, urban legends, and myths.


Number one, if the information on the ticket is wrong, then the ticket will be thrown out. Maybe. Probably not. When you’ve had over 60 tickets, just about anything that can be written down wrong has probably been written down wrong on one of those tickets. I have never had a ticket dismissed because of erroneous information. Not one time. You have to realize that a ticket is not a strict legal, binding document. It is simply an accusation. This is why they tell you that signing it isn’t a admission of guilt. The officer is simply recording the facts as he saw them, and in lieu of him taking you to jail, you’re agreeing that you are aware that he has accused you of wrong doing and that you will show up to the court to settle the matter. That’s all it is. If there’s erroneous information on it, he can certainly amend or change the ticket. He doesn’t even have to do this before it arrives in the courtroom for your trial. If you choose to go this route, and I highly, highly, highly recommend that you don’t, because it’s a gamble, this is your only shot – dispute the information in court. What you’ll need to do is get him to verify under oath the information on the ticket as true to the best of his recollection, then you will have to prove that the information on the ticket is incorrect. If it’s really an egregious error, then you might cast enough doubt on his testimony to get the ticket dismissed. If he can’t remember what color car you were driving, or what the license plate number was, or what road you were on, then maybe he was so incompetent at the time of the citation that he couldn’t reasonably be sure you were speeding. Again, it’s a gamble, and a pretty high stakes one.


Number two, if the officer doesn’t show, the ticket will be dismissed. True. But don’t ever count on this. I’ve had exactly two tickets dismissed because the officer didn’t show. I’ve seen very few dismissed for the same reason, with one notable exception – when the traffic ticket requires the verification of a third individual. There is a court near my home town that loves to write tickets for cutting in the ferry line. Usually, the officer does not see the violation, another individual brings it to his attention. If this third individual does not show up for court, then it is impossible to verify that the violation ever took place, and the ticket is dismissed. People do not usually show up for these, because it’s such a pain in the ass to show up in court for something that no longer really concerns you.


Number three, you should just walk in, plead guilty and throw yourself at the mercy of the court. No. Never, ever, do this. This is such a gamble. Certainly, there are judges who will take pity on you, and will reduce your fine or give you a break. It’s happened to me, more than once, and that’s how I used to fight tickets before I knew better. But here’s the problem, if the judge doesn’t take pity on you, for whatever reason, you’ve just said you were guilty! Under oath in a court of law! You have no more options! You’re guilty! Good luck appealing, or using your defensive driving or anything else, you’ve just eliminated a good majority of your options by saying you did it. Believe me, there are many more judges who will nail your ass to the wall for pleading guilty than will save it. It’s very likely you’ll get the maximum punishment, in which case you should have just paid the fine and saved yourself some time. I know you’re wondering why the judge is going to nail you to the wall, so I’ll tell you – you’re wasting the court’s time. Traffic court is very boring and takes much longer than it should, because everyone wants to go up and give an excuse for doing something that was against the law, which isn’t a defense anyway, all the while claiming they are guilty of the crime. If you don’t have a defense, why the fuck are you in a courtroom?


Number four, the officer wouldn’t show me the reading on the gun (or some other “proof” of the violation), therefore, he shouldn’t have written me the ticket. Nope. He can write you a ticket just because he thinks you were speeding. He doesn’t have to prove anything until it goes to court.


Number five, I’m innocent, so I should get off. No, no, no, a thousand times now. Go back and read the first part of this article, specifically, the part about this not being about rights and wrongs and guilt and innocence. I hate to break it to you, it matters not that you are innocent or guilty. Your road is just as hard either way, and it is probably in your best interests to understand now that it is going to cost you some money. Remember, we’re just trying to minimize that. Yes, I’ve gotten tickets I shouldn’t have gotten. I got convicted on them too – most of the time, it’s your word (or you and your friend’s) against that of the officer and prosecuting attorney. It is very hard to prove that the officer is lying or mistaken, even if he is. If you can indeed prove this, it’s probably better to prove it to the prosecuting attorney (detailed below) and get the ticket dismissed outright.


Now that you’re actually going to fight, let’s detail your first court experience. There should be a court date somewhere on your ticket. Actually, this isn’t even a court date, per se, it’s just the time by which you have to contact the court, either over the phone or in person to settle the accusations against you. Don’t bother calling for the first week or so after your ticket – they won’t have any record of it yet, and you’re just wasting your time and the court’s time, and showing you have no understanding of how the game is played.


Usually, about a week before the due date, I call the court. Most of the time, you can make your initial plea over the phone, but sometimes, you’ll have to go down to the court in person to do it. Your options are: guilty, not guilty, or nolo contendere (no contest). The first and last options are bad. I’ve explained why the first is bad, even if you get to give an explanation, and the last is simply another way of stating the first – I’m guilty, but I don’t want to say I’m guilty, so I won’t contest the accusations against me. The only one that should interest you is, “not guilty”.


Once you make this plea, you will be assigned a court date to formally make your plea. This is an arraignment, not a trial. However, be prepared that if you in person to make your plea, you may proceed directly to arraignment, and if you go for arraignment, it’s possible (though not usual) for a trial to immediately follow. It is best if you ask the court about these things, and it is in your best interest to show up prepared and dressed properly, even if you do not expect a trial today. On that note, let me address the issue of dress. Most of the people who fight tickets are the dregs of society. They can’t afford the ticket, so they go to court to fight it, hoping either to get their fine reduced or an extended payment plan. Go to the supermarket in the worst area of town, pick out the ten people dressed the worst, and you will see the kind of people who make up 90% of the people you’ll see in court. They come to court wearing the worst things, so bad in fact, that there is usually a sign stating inappropriate attire. These are usually things you should know not to wear, like flip flops and shorts, but people do it anyway (and get thrown out of court). Some wear clothes that have visible holes, some look like they haven’t bathed in a year. I’m not saying not to feel sorry for them, but I am saying that you don’t want to look like them. These are the average person the judge sees every day, and every one of them wants a special break because they are poor, and they don’t have a good defense, and they are guilty, and they won’t be able to feed their kids, and on and on and on and on. Notice something? They are wasting the court’s time. Judges hate that. If you dress like that, he will assume you’re there to waste the court’s time like everyone else. Every once in a while, these people will show up in a button up shirt and tie. That’s not bad, but it’s obvious you still don’t know how to dress for court. Look around you. Everyone who does real business in this arena wears a suit. If you want to be respected, then you also need to wear a suit. It doesn’t have to be a $2000 Armani designer suit, but it should be nice. This will tell the court that you understand how the game is played, you respect the court, and even though everyone else is here to waste the court’s time, you are here to make an argument. Even if you’re not. You’d be surprised how many people forget or overlook this very simple and very effective tool.


Now, let’s make our plea. The first thing we want to do is plead not guilty. The second thing we want to do is ask for a trial. Texas offers you the option of a jury or judge trial, I highly recommend taking the jury. Your state may not offer this option, but if it does, take it. After you’ve done this, you need to go back and remember our goals. Remember, our primary goal is minimizing damage, specifically keeping this ticket off your record and out of the eyes of the insurance company. Even though we’ve asked for a trial, we are going to do everything we can to avoid actually going to trial. Trial is risky. Sure, you might win, but you also might lose. Losing sucks, and it causes us to not achieve the primary goal. So, if we have to sacrifice a few secondary goals to ensure that we achieve our primary goal, it’s worth it. However, you must make the appearance of being willing to go all the way to trial, or the court will call your bluff. It’s very much like a poker game. The idea is to make all your opponents fold long before the river card comes out. Even if you’ve got an incredible hand, it can still be beaten, and it’s better to win a small amount of money than it is to lose big.


After you made your plea, remember that we have to go to arraignment to formally make our plea to the court. This is a very good time to bargain, and I’m usually not in court past this point, unless the court just won’t deal. Before you actually make your plea to the judge, you’ll probably meet with the prosecuting attorney. Funny how no one ever mentions him, but he’s the one that pulls all the strings. He gets to decide if your case ever even sees the inside of a courtroom. He’s not your friend, but he is someone to negotiate with. Typically, this is a very informal meeting. His primary concern is figuring out why you’re fighting this ticket and how to keep it out of the courtroom. Remember how I told you we want to keep it from going to trial? Well, he really doesn’t want it to go to trial either. It’s a risk for him to take it to trial, particularly if it’s a jury trial. Number one, it’s going to cost the court time and money to prosecute, meaning that less money goes into the general coffers. Number two, there’s a decent chance he could loose, especially with a jury trial (and those cost even more money). He doesn’t know who will show up for jury duty that day, and maybe one of those people is like me, and just won’t convict on a minor traffic violation, no matter how much evidence there is. Remember, it’s all about revenue generation, not right and wrong, and going to court is a huge wildcard and always costs money. This is a huge bargaining chip for you, and you need to fully realize it. You also need to realize that this isn’t the last time you’ll see the prosecuting attorney.


So, his first question will attempt to determine why you’re there. Be honest, but don’t reveal too much. Don’t talk about your guilt or your innocence, or even about the case. Just tell him that the ticket isn’t the real issue, you just don’t want the points or insurance to find out about it (your primary goal). Now, this is like gold to the prosecuting attorney. You’re telling him, without saying so much, that you don’t care if the court gets your money, you just don’t want anyone else to get any of it. This gives him a lot of options to keep it out of court, because ultimately, the court will get their money. Now, every once in a while, you’ll get a PA who is either too greedy or too concerned with right and wrong to fully comprehend the game that’s being played. This happens, and is more likely in a small court than a large one. This is where you have to be flexible.


At this point, one of several things will happen. He may press to see how serious you are about fighting. This is where you might present any evidence you might have, and try to convince him that the case really has no merit. I had a friend get out of a seatbelt ticket just last week by showing the PA that he had photos showing that it was impossible under the conditions for the officer to determine if his seatbelt was fastened (it was, incidentally) or not. No trial, no court, no nothing. Just dismissed. Your concern here is convincing the PA that you actually are serious, and you’ll go all the way to trial if you have to.


The attorney may also offer you a deal. If it’s a good deal, take it. To me, a good deal is a reduced fine, no points, no record, no insurance hit. Sometimes they may not reduce the fine, or they may require you to take a driving class, or some other crap. This is always open to negotiation, and feel free to ask for anything you think you might can get. What you will have to keep in mind is that if you can’t reach a deal here, it is going to at least cost you more time. The deal you will accept may depend on how valuable your time is to you. I have accepted some pretty mediocre deals just to keep the ticket off my record and keep me from spending any more time.


Sometimes, the PA won’t deal, or won’t make a deal that you can live with. In this case, he’ll set a trial date for you. This is not the end of the world, even though we don’t really want to go to court. At this point, you may wish to reconsider your driver’s education class, or you might want to get some more evidence, or you might want to go to court. These are all options you’ll have to weigh and validate for yourself. Every court and every case is different.


On the subject of evidence, I’ll just say this: I usually don’t bother gathering any, though I bring a briefcase to court to make it look like I have some. Remember, for me, this is all just a bluff to get out of the ticket. The last place I want to be is in front of a judge and jury – and I’ve only been there a couple of times. Often these cases will come down to the officer’s word against your word, and we all know how that comes out, right? Now, if you’re serious about going all the way to trial with this, you might want to contact the court and do a public records request and make sure that the officer is current with his calibrations and certifications. The paynofine pdf goes into that in a lot of detail, so I’ll refer you to that document if you want to pursue that route. Be aware that many officers do keep their calibrations and certifications current, or at the very least, make sure to make it look like they do.


The next thing that will happen is your trial date will come up, usually sometime in the moderately distant future. You will meet with the PA again before your trial. This is when your bargaining power is at its highest. He really doesn’t want a trial any more than you do, and he’s going to try to cut his losses. He does have a few hole cards though, he knows if the officer has shown up today, and he knows how solid (or not solid) his evidence against you is. If you have gotten to this point, now is the time to ask for the sun, the moon, and the stars. Chances are extremely good that you will get it.


If you don’t get it, you will proceed to trial. Scary, huh? Don’t sweat it so much. Pick the best jury you can, and make the prosecution prove their case. Don’t even worry so much about your evidence, or even if you can prove anything. Even if you lose, this is still far from over.


Remember that 105 in a 55 I mentioned above? The one I had to get a lawyer for? Well, it happened in the smallest of small towns, and the judge and PA didn’t want to deal. We went through all the steps above, and they were unyielding. Even the public records request was no help. To be fair, what I had done was a fairly serious crime, and I don’t blame them for wanting to nail my nuts to the wall over it. I know I deserved it. We went all the way to trial, picked a jury, went through trial, and lost. End of the world, game over, right?


Wrong. We immediately appealed the decision. This cost me a little bit of money, as I had to put up a bond equal to the amount of the ticket – which was not a small amount. This kicked my case up to the county level. Understand, county is a huge court, and they don’t normally deal with traffic tickets. They have ‘real crime’ to deal with, and much more serious things than a speeding ticket. They took one look at my case and said, “what in the hell is this doing clogging up my court?” Well, I assume that, because they were pissed when it came up. Note that they were not pissed at me, they were pissed at the lower court for not handling the case and keeping out of their hair. Regardless of the guilt, it was such a minor thing in the eyes of the county court that the lower court should have bargained with me so that it didn’t get to this level. But it did, and now it was wasting their time. Remember again, judges hate to have the court’s time wasted – only in this case, they saw it not as my fault, but the lower court’s fault. They were so mad, they knocked my fine down to a trivial amount and changed the ticket to an equipment violation, meaning no points, no record, and insurance never found out.


All that said, it is better to avoid getting a ticket in the first place. Always be alert, attentive, and use your radar detector. If you do manage to get stopped, be kind and courteous and try your best to negotiate a warning rather than a ticket.

28 May 2008

Here's where it starts.

I've been wanting to write this blog for quite some time, and now, it's time.

Last year I got nine tickets. One for reckless driving, one for failure to stop at a stop sign, one for failure to signal a turn, and six for speeding. Exactly none of them went on my record. My friends constantly ask me "how in the world do you do it?" and I'm tired of detailing all the steps and writing and rewriting it on various forums at various times. From here on out, I'll just point them to TicketBastard.

First things first, I am not a lawyer. I do not practice law, and this blog does not constitute any kind of legal advice. Second, I live in Texas and I am most familiar with the traffic courts in Texas. If you do not live in Texas, the information here may or may not be applicable to you. It may not help you, and it may even hurt you. If you have a serious ticket or if you're inexperienced in the courts of your state, it is highly advisable that you hire a lawyer. Even the TicketBastard still hires a lawyer from time to time.

A little bit of backstory before I get into the real meat of this blog. This is the story of how it all came about. When I was a kid of 16, who barely had his license four whole months, I did something really stupid and got a really large ticket as a result: 65 mph in a 30 mph zone. There's no justifying what I did, it was a residential area and I was being really, really dumb. Of all the tickets I didn't deserve, that's one I truly did.

Now, in Texas you can take defensive driving for almost any ticket you get. Today you can do that once a year, back then, you could do it once every three years. Now, if that had been one of those tickets, or if I could have just paid it, I would have done so and our story would have ended here. There would be no TicketBastard and no blog. I wouldn't be an unrepentant speeder, and I wouldn't have racked up so many tickets that I couldn't even remember all of them today. You might as well ask me to remember all the times I've eaten steak. I can remember the really memorable ones and some of the not so memorable ones, but the majority have been lost to the sands of time. Let me just say that the last time I could count them all, I was well over 60, and that was 10 years ago. You do the math.

So, what happened? First, in Texas you can only take defensive driving for tickets that are less than 25 mph over the speed limit. Since I was 35 over, that wasn't really an option. Since I had doubled the speed limit and I was only 16, the court required a mandatory court appearance -- with my parents. Now, my parents were understandably pissed and grounded me pretty heavily. And, this was also a very small town, and my stepfather was very good friends with the judge. Between the two of them, they cooked up a plan to really put the fear of the law into me while at the same time keeping the insurance company from raping my stepfather's pocketbook.

This is where things went wickedly, wickedly wrong. They decided to make me attend traffic court, and they scheduled it for a heavy day filled with the dregs of society. This was supposed to teach me that only the most irresponsible people get tickets and that a courtroom was the last place I wanted to spend my time. Unfortunately, in the words of my stepfather, I was "always trying to figure out how to get away with something." I was also usually smart enough to do just that. As I sat there in court that day, watching everyone plead their traffic cases (since I was convienently at the bottom of the docket), I noticed a strange pattern. Now, this particular judge was a very nice, very lienent man, but I noticed that everyone, without fail, got some kind of break on their case. Some didn't have much of a case, others had a decent excuse, but it pretty much seemed that just by the virtue of taking the time to appear in court, they ended up far better off than if they'd just done like every Joe Schmo and just paid their ticket.

Now let me tell you, these really were the "undesirables" in town. As it normally is in most traffic cases. That's because most of the people who fight do so because they have no other option -- they simply don't have the money to pay their tickets. Most of them were there just to get extensions to pay them, but usually, they got a reduction in fees to go with it. That was just because the judge was a nice guy. But, still, I was seeing that just because you got a ticket didn't mean you were guilty ... even if you actually were.

When it came time for me to see the judge, he gave me a really stern lecture and told me he hoped I'd learned my lesson. He also asked what my parents had done when they found out about my ticket. I told him, and though I can't distinctly remember the punishment, I do remember it being very harsh -- my parents were not lenient people. I'll never forget what he said next. He told me that ordinarily with such a ticket, he would add a substantial additional fine to the already substantial mandatory fine, and that he would have pressed for a license suspension. But, he felt I'd already been punished enough, and he was just going to dismiss the ticket outright.

And thus, the TicketBastard was born. I realized that although I had gotten somewhat lucky, just a little bit of time in court and a little effort could go a long way to keeping tickets off your record. I didn't achieve it overnight, I made a lot of mistakes, and several of my early tickets went on my record, but in the end, I learned the truth behind speeding tickets.

The truth that I'll now pass on to you.